Monstrous women and mothers

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

So many women in myths and history become ( or simply are named) monsters because they are too sexual, sexually alluring or sexually unavailable, opinionated or non-compliant, different and therefore frightening. Debbie Felton wrote that this “spoke to men’s fear of women’s destructive potential. The myths then, to a certain extent, fulfill a male fantasy of conquering and controlling the female.” ( via Smithsonian magazine). I enjoyed Jess Zimmerman’s “ Women and Other Monsters”, which explored some of the Greek monster myths anew, and more and more people are exploring the collision of our out-sized ( monstrous) ideas and expectations of both women in general and mothers specifically.

For a slightly different ( and extremely lovely) take, I was really struck by a brief passage in Ocean Vuong’s “ On Earth We are Briefly Gorgeous”, which is written as a letter to his traumatized, complicated mother.

“ ‘Youre not a monster,’ I said.

But I lied.

What I really wanted to say was that a monster is not such a terrible thing to be. From the Latin root monstrum, a deivide messenger of catastrophe, then adapted by the Old French to mean an anmil of myriad origins: centaur, griffin, satyr. To be a monster is to be a hybrid signal, a lighthouse:both shelter and warning at once.”

This is an old Mexican postcard I found in a junk store in Texas.

Connection

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

Recently my subject matter has shifted from solo women or mirrored pairs to those specifically interacting, whether it is the mirrored pair holding hands, or another gesture of connection. I have had this postcard, found amongst my grandmothers old stuff, on my studio wall for ages. The tenderness and trust in the shapes of this odd sculpture of Christ and John is so lovely. This is the type of silent but deeply felt interactions I hope to imply.

christus und johannes




Summertime Watercolors

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

With summer comes travel, and, ideally, with travel comes sketching and water-coloring on site. Here are some paintings from last summer’s visit to Italy.

IMG_5919.jpg
IMG_6242+%281%29.jpg
IMG_6251.jpg

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

“ To spin the web and not be caught in it, to creat the world, to create your own life, to rule your fate, to name the grandmothers as well as the fathers, to draw nets and not just straight lines, to be a maker as well as a cleaner, to be able to sing and not be silenced, to take down the veil and appear: all these are te banners on the laundry line i hang out. “ Rebecca Solnit

Nasty Women and the possibility of better art

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

Given the tone of the campaign, the election of Donald Trump, and the swiftly ensuing threats to basic rights, many of us are both terrified and more engaged in the political process.  Within the first few weeks of 2017 I already participated in two shows titled " Nasty Women", including the massive cash-and-carry show at the Knockdown Center in Queens that earned 35K for Planned Parenthood, a benefit for the ACLU and personally auctioned pieces on facebook for Planned Parenthood and the ACLU. 

The critic Jerry Saltz wrote on November 13, 2016: "The election left many feeling alienated, alone, in shapeless psychic pain.  But in fact this foul, broken, alien place is a very old locus of art. Rectly, art has been this high-powered-success-machine mainstream sensation; artists have beome celebrities; we've been treated to narcissistic pictures of pretty people at glamorous events wearing $2,000 worth of clothes".  The gist is, politically the situation sucks, but it may turn out to be a great thing for art. 

Time will tell if that turns out to be true but the political reality has motivated me and many artists I know to be vocal, active and communal in new ways. 

Resist (11.5 x 9.5) 2016_edited-1.jpg

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

I was delighted to participate in " Be Here Now #2" in Brooklyn on October 23.  445 female artists gathered in the Brooklyn Museum as they had earlier in L.A. to make a stand and take a photograph. Here it is:

unspecified.jpeg

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

"'seeing things' is an act of comparison, memory, labeling, and fiction."-Laurie Anderson

I keep returning to this quote from Laurie Anderson from her wonderful interview on thecreativeindependent.com. She conveys succinctly how complicated and malleable the process of seeing really is.  I had noticed even as a child when I drew from life, how what I was observing seemed to change the longer and harder I looked.  Anderson's quote reminds me that, similar to the way that memories shift and evolve, how and in fact, what, we see is as much about what we are bringing to the act of seeing as it is about what it is we see. Looking and rendering can feel like claiming an object or scene, and then releasing it.  It can feel like naming something or admitting a mystery. For me as I paint or draw, how I see can be possessive, generous, melancholy or celebratory, sometimes even all of the above over the course of one art making session.  

 

 

 

Works in Process

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

“Male fantasies, male fantasies, is everything run by male fantasies? Up on a pedestal or down on your knees, it's all a male fantasy: that you're strong enough to take what they dish out, or else too weak to do anything about it. Even pretending you aren't catering to male fantasies is a male fantasy: pretending you're unseen, pretending you have a life of your own, that you can wash your feet and comb your hair unconscious of the ever-present watcher peering through the keyhole, peering through the keyhole in your own head, if nowhere else. You are a woman with a man inside watching a woman. You are your own voyeur.” 
― Margaret AtwoodThe Robber Bride

New Monoprints

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

Doing oil paint mono prints using a brayer and spoons, printing from my palette.  I'm liking some of the effects but have not yet figured out how to get the saturation of color I want without a press ( and a complete squashy mess)! 

Encouragement from Hawaii

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

 The Booooooom blog (http://www.booooooom.com) recently did a "free encouragement from hawaii" project.  A supportive postcard would be sent from a friendly stranger if you left your request in the comment section.  Well, I did. I said that I could use a boost as right after my studio was broken into I came down with a wicked flu- all true.  And like magic, THREE postcards arrived for me yesterday! So nice. 

boooom-postcards.jpg

That's art for you

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

“Looking through a book of drawings by Holbein I realize several moments of truth.  A nose ( a line) so nose-like.  So line-like.  And then I think to myself  ‘so what?’. It’s not going to solve any of my problems.  And then I realize that at the very moments of appreciation I had no problems. Then I decide that this is a pretty profound thought.  And that I ought to write it down.  That is what I have just done.  But it doesn’t sound so profound anymore.  That’s art for you. " -Joe Brainard

Authenticity, intent and change

Added on by Elissa Swanger.

 

Over the holidays I read the New York Times December 22, 2013 article “ Tricky Business: Defining Authenticity”. It is a fascinating report of the difficulties in authenticating and preserving Minimalist and Conceptual artworks. The bulk of the article is dedicated to reporting how institutions such as The Guggenheim are grappling with both the problems of preserving and displaying works in line with the artists intentions and the implicated questions of how and why we as a culture define and, subsequently, place a monetary (or historical) value on art.

Two things stayed with me from the article. The first is that Robert Morris, when angry at Philip Johnson for not paying for his sculpture, wrote him that he was taking back “ all aethestic quality”, making it a valueless hunk of metal and wood.   (Both aforementioned sculpture AND letter are now in the MOMA collection).  This both brilliant as a conceptual move and absurd. It assumes that either both subscribe to the idea that the artist’s intent is all, or that even if Johnson, does not, Morris’ intent as artist trumps Johnson.  As there is no question that abundant “ aethestic quality” resides in innumerable valueless things, what Morris is really doing is more akin to erasing his signature to render his artwork “worthless”.  However, this choice of words implies more than just that the artist’s intent/will is the ultimate decider, but that without the artist’s cooperation, viewers will not (properly) enjoy it.   This is an idea I have not heard discussed much, at least in terms of visual art; there seems to be a feeling that once the (non- performance) artwork has left the studio it becomes its own entity separate from the artist.

The second item that stuck with me is a small phrase from a quote from Jeffrey Weiss, Guggenheim’s senior in charge of the Panza Collection. He says, “ People are always asking us ‘what does the artist want’? - As if that’s a simple, monolithic thing.  It turns out that it’s one of the most complicated parts of the whole process. It’s not just him [sculptor Robert Morris specifically, who has changed his ideas about the physical importance of his work] and us.  It’s the changing him and the informed us.”

I love the phrase “ the changing him”.  We are of course, all changing all this time, but as my instinct is often to dig in my heels and resist all change this is a lovely reminder, most especially in the studio and with the coincidence of the advent of new year, to continue pushing, destroying, reworking and generally giving myself permission to be the changing me.